When I was at the World Fantasy Convention this weekend, the subject of my blog came up (the way it does). I was talking about how I normally don’t do the standard convention reports here because I think they can be kind of boring for a wider audience. (Especially if you don’t drop lots of high status primate names, which weirds me out a smidge and also makes me live in fear of forgetting to mention All the Names, even though that is an impossible task.) I said that what I sometimes do instead is write about something I learned at the convention.
So now I have created expectations.
I had a convention strategy this year, which sounds a lot more impressive than it actually is. In years past, I have mainly tried to hit the big literary conventions (WorldCon and World Fantasy, along with SCBWI). But this year I decided I had the time and resources to do more, and I hit a few smaller regional conventions too; in addition to my local FogCon, I attended ConFusion in Detroit, the Rainforest Retreat in Washington, and Readercon in Boston. For those keeping track, that means in the past ten months I’ve attended seven writing events in addition to my two mini-retreats in Seattle.
My thought was that by attending some events outside of my local sphere, I’d get to meet writers who don’t necessarily travel out to the big conventions. This definitely proved to be the case. But another benefit was getting to spend quality time with people at the smaller events, and then being able to reconnect at the big conventions (where I might otherwise have never even met them).

Look! Fire escape! (I don’t know what this photo has to do with this post, either, but work with me here.)
To say that I’m happy with my year of writerly events is an understatement. But I’ve also been thinking about a conversation I had with Nick Mamatas (at Readercon) about conventions. “Why do you go to conventions?” he asked me. It was his opinion that, career-wise, I might as well stay home.
Now we can talk about promotion and networking and showing your face enough times that even the people you haven’t met or have only exchanged a few words with in passing feel like they know you. But Nick might very well be right. And it is certainly true that one can have a career as a writer without attending very many (if any) of these events, especially in the early stages. We can also talk about filling the well of inspiration, but there are more economical ways of doing that too.
No, when it comes right down to it, I attend conventions because I enjoy them. I love seeing my writer friends and making new ones. I like meeting new people. I like talking about books and writing and the publishing industry to my heart’s content. I like geeking out. I enjoy the hustle and bustle, the late nights and the groggy mornings, the packed hotel party rooms and the serendipitous meetings. I value being a part of this kooky, geeky, sometimes really screwed-up, passionate, generous community.
So that’s what I’ve learned, that for me it’s not about dollars and cents and how much exposure I got in exchange for my airfare. There’s nothing wrong with thinking of it that way–indeed, calculating return on investment is an important part of running a business–but for me, attending conventions is more than simply business.
For me, attending conventions means I get to travel while spending time with some of my favorite people. Not a bad deal at all.
Yes, exactly! I attend conventions because they basically *are* my social life. It’s where I see my friends and make new ones. I can’t imagine cons doing anything for me professionally at this point in my career (John and I were just talking about this last night, in fact). But people are awesome, and cons are where I find them.
It was great to see you! 😀
It was great to see you too, as always. 🙂 And yes, conventions definitely enhance my social life, especially now that I have so many friends who aren’t anywhere close to being local.
Good post, Amy, and I’m in the same boat. Cons are the best way to hang out with my community. All the communications online are great, but there’s nothing like facetime with your friends and colleagues. 🙂
Yeah, I really do love face time. I’m grateful for electronic communication to hold things together in the meantime, but it’s not the same.
I need Cons. I have a tendency to interpret people’s instructions differently than they meant them. For example, I have in the past misinterpreted something Nick Mamatas wrote on a rejection. It’s only when I can talk to people and ask what they meant by what they said, that I can learn. It was only after I started to go to spec fiction workshops and Cons that I started getting my spec fiction published.
And I’m so glad you found both of those things, so we could meet! 🙂 I definitely found cons to be useful in a different kind of way when I first started going. And I’m sure I’ll find them to be useful in a different kind of way again in the future as my career changes.